Are you the publisher? Claim or contact us about this channel


Embed this content in your HTML

Search

Report adult content:

click to rate:

Account: (login)

More Channels


Channel Catalog


older | 1 | .... | 3029 | 3030 | (Page 3031) | 3032 | 3033 | .... | 3119 | newer

    0 0

    Reporter stephane mainchain (sma44) stephane mainchain (sma44)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 1:15:24 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 1:15:24 PM
    State Open
    Assignee Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
    Subsystem Reports
    Type Feature
    Priority Normal
    Fix versions Unscheduled

    The report should be able to list each project time report without the details.
    Currently:
    Project A Time Estimated xxh Time Spent xxh
    A. Card1 xxh xxh
    A. Card2 xxh xxh
    ...
    Project B Time Estimated xxh Time Spent xxh

    The "no per user, no per issue" view should show:
    Project A Time Estimated xxh Time Spent xxh
    Project B Time Estimated xxh Time Spent xxh
    Project C Time Estimated xxh Time Spent xxh

    The excel export is currently not usable as each issue entry is listed as one line and no global project statistics are directly usable.


    0 0

    Reporter Andrea Sciamanna (sciamannikoo) Andrea Sciamanna (sciamannikoo)
    Created Nov 16, 2017 10:58:29 AM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 1:22:44 PM
    State Open
    Assignee Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
    Subsystem Gantt Chart
    Type Feature
    Priority Normal
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    The "Capacity" setting for the Gantt chart is close to useless considering JT-38627.

    Even assuming there is only one developer per project, it must at least have an option to evaluate the capacity per project.

    That is, if I have three projects in the chart and I have set the capacity to 2, there must be up to 6 simultaneous issues in total, or better, no more than two simultaneous issues for the same project.

    0 0

    Reporter stephane mainchain (sma44) stephane mainchain (sma44)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 1:19:40 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 1:23:02 PM
    State Open
    Assignee Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
    Subsystem Gantt Chart
    Type Feature
    Priority Normal
    Fix versions Unscheduled

    Capacity is currently set to 1,2,3 assuming the resource assigned to the tasks is at 100% capacity.
    E.g. It should support resource with 80% (0.8) or 50% (0.5) to reflect if one can not plan that 1 resource is assigned less than 100% (in that case the Gantt is unusable).

    Looks also related to JT-44405.


    0 0

    Reporter Stephane Mainchain (stephane.mainchain) Stephane Mainchain (stephane.mainchain)
    Created Jun 15, 2017 12:59:06 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 1:24:27 PM
    State Open
    Assignee Anna Zhdan (Anna.Zhdan)
    Subsystem Search
    Type Bug
    Priority Normal
    Browser Chrome
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions 2017.2
    What steps will reproduce the problem?
    1. Create a story
    2. Create a sub task of this story
    3. Execute search: (#story and has: -{Parent for}) => the story does not appear (this is ok as it has a sub task)
    4. Delete sub task (without deleting the parent link
    5 Execute search request (#story and has: -{Parent for}) => the story does not appear (it should as it does not have the sub task anymore

    Replacing step 4 with a real parent link remove => the request (#story and has: -{Parent for}) is fine.

    0 0
  • 10/31/18--03:28: JT-50081: -126
  • Reporter Exception Robot (app_exception) Exception Robot (app_exception)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 1:26:54 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 1:28:58 PM
    Resolved Oct 31, 2018 1:28:58 PM
    State Duplicate
    Assignee Unassigned
    Subsystem No Subsystem
    Type Exception
    Priority Major
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions 2018.3
    Original content visible to jetbrains team only for security reasons

    0 0

    Reporter Guillaume LE BIGOT (guillaume.lebigot) Guillaume LE BIGOT (guillaume.lebigot)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 1:17:05 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 1:35:24 PM
    State Submitted
    Assignee Unassigned
    Subsystem No Subsystem
    Type Bug
    Priority Normal
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions 2018.3.46727, 2018.3

    Youtrack 2018.3 - Build 46727
    We have a standalone gitlab installation on a Server G that as a https:// access
    We have a standalone youtrack installation on a Server Y that has a reverse proxy with apache2.

    What steps will reproduce the problem?

    1. first of all we add this configuration : java -jar /path-to-jar-file/youtrack.jar configure --listen-port 1111 --base-url https://our-youtrack-server-name.com
    2. we start youtrack
    3. Gitlab > go to settings > allow outbound requests
    4. Youtrack > go to VCS integration on panel admin and add our gitlab url (https://) with a generated keystore containing the private key and cert
    5. Youtrack > go on our project > VCS integration
    6. choose the VCS server added previsously and set the access_token with all scopes generated on our gitlab installation
    7. click on the submit button

    What is the expected result?
    A successfull return message for example :)

    What happens instead?
    On display : tooltip that informs a problem of overload our else...
    On firebug console : a 500 internal server error

    I discover that the 500 internal server error is the same if I choose bitbucket.org with fake values.

    As you can see on attachments, the request is a POST on our Youtrack server but I havn't any logs.
    I would like to enable more logs and know where they are exactly.
    Can you please send me a list of category events I can add in the admin logging section ?

    Here is the apache2 configuration for the reverse proxy. We do not use a specific port listening, we just want the standard 443.
    I have some doubts concerning the reverse proxy.

    Listen 443 https
    
    <VirtualHost *:1111>
    	ServerName our-youtrack-server-name.com
    	ErrorLog "/var/log/apache2/error_youtrack.log"
    </VirtualHost>
    
    <VirtualHost *:443>
            ServerName our-youtrack-server-name.com
    	Protocols http/1.1
    
    	RequestHeader set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
    
    	RewriteEngine on
    	AllowEncodedSlashes on
    
    	ProxyRequests off
    
            ProxyPass / http://127.0.0.1:1111/
            ProxyPassReverse / http://127.0.0.1:1111/
    
            #SSLEngine On
            SSLCertificateFile "our-sys-path-to-cert-file"
            SSLCertificateKeyFile "our-sys-path-to-private-key"
    
    	ErrorLog "/var/log/apache2/error_youtrack.log"
    </VirtualHost>
    
    <VirtualHost *:80>
    	Redirect permanent / https://our-youtrack-server-name.com/
    </VirtualHost>
    
    

    Thank you for your help.


    0 0
  • 10/31/18--03:51: JT-50082: 147
  • Reporter Exception Robot (app_exception) Exception Robot (app_exception)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 1:49:53 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 1:51:56 PM
    Resolved Oct 31, 2018 1:51:56 PM
    State Duplicate
    Assignee Unassigned
    Subsystem No Subsystem
    Type Exception
    Priority Major
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions 2018.3
    Original content visible to jetbrains team only for security reasons

    0 0

    Reporter Dmitry Cherniachenko (sabio) Dmitry Cherniachenko (sabio)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 2:00:30 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 2:00:30 PM
    State Submitted
    Assignee Unassigned
    Subsystem No Subsystem
    Type Feature
    Priority Normal
    Fix versions Unscheduled

    I don't care about JetBrains internal "bookkeeping" and do not want to receive an email every time my issue has been "triaged".

    Configuring update notifications per field is probably too much.
    So how about adding an option to not send notifications about the changes in "bookkeeping" fields like Triaged, Spent time, Verified by, Tester, etc.


    0 0

    Reporter Ricardo Coelho (Ricardo_Coelho) Ricardo Coelho (Ricardo_Coelho)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 2:05:34 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 2:12:50 PM
    State Open
    Assignee Alexander Anisimov (xi-eye)
    Subsystem Single Issue View
    Type Bug
    Priority Normal
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions 2018.3.46727

    What steps will reproduce the problem?

    1. edit a comment with a restricted visibility
    2. add an attachment
    3. save

    What is the expected result?
    The attachement has the same visibility as the comment.

    What happens instead?
    The attachement is visible to everyone.


    0 0
  • 10/31/18--04:15: JT-50083: 104
  • Reporter Exception Robot (app_exception) Exception Robot (app_exception)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 1:54:44 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 2:15:35 PM
    Resolved Oct 31, 2018 2:15:35 PM
    State Duplicate
    Assignee Unassigned
    Subsystem No Subsystem
    Type Exception
    Priority Major
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions 2018.3
    Original content visible to jetbrains team only for security reasons

    0 0
  • 10/31/18--04:15: JT-50086: -68
  • Reporter Exception Robot (app_exception) Exception Robot (app_exception)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 2:03:23 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 2:15:39 PM
    Resolved Oct 31, 2018 2:15:39 PM
    State Duplicate
    Assignee Unassigned
    Subsystem No Subsystem
    Type Exception
    Priority Major
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions 2018.3
    Original content visible to jetbrains team only for security reasons

    0 0

    Reporter Exception Robot (app_exception) Exception Robot (app_exception)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 1:57:24 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 2:16:58 PM
    State Open
    Assignee Vyacheslav Lukianov (hoegaarden)
    Subsystem Full Text Index
    Type Exception
    Priority Major
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions 2018.3
    Original content visible to jetbrains team only for security reasons

    0 0

    Reporter Liubov Melnikova (Liubov.Melnikova) Liubov Melnikova (Liubov.Melnikova)
    Created Aug 28, 2018 9:52:37 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 2:31:37 PM
    Resolved Sep 6, 2018 7:15:03 PM
    State Verified
    Assignee Leonid Stryuk (Leonid.Stryuk)
    Subsystem GitLab Integration
    Type Bug
    Priority Normal
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions 2018.3.46358
    Affected versions Unknown
    STR:
    1. create nested GitLab repositories:
    - foo/repo1.git
    - foo/repo2.git
    - foo/bar/repo3.git
    - foo/bar/repo4.git

    2. create new GitLab user (called "Integration") that will be used only for GitLab ↔ YouTrack integration (and I've set this user as "External"

    3. impersonate to this user and create "Personal Access Token" with "api" as single scope

    4. Go to YouTrack. Using "New VCS Integration" feature under project setting try to connect YouTrack to GitLab (using previously generated Personal Access Token and having "foo" as owner of the repo) in following different situations:
    a) when "Integration" user is a member of "foo/repo1.git": the "repo1.git" should be available in the YouTrack
    b) when "Integration" user is a member of "foo" group: the "repo1.git" and "repo2.git" should be available in the YouTrack (but none of the "bar" subgroup repositories)
    c) when "Integration" user is a member of "foo/bar/repo3.git": the "repo3.git" IS NOT available in YouTrack
    d) when "Integration" user is a member of "foo/bar" subgroup: the "repo3.git" and "repo4.git" ARE NOT available in YouTrack

    Problematic scenario are: 4c and 4d (and eventually 4b, but this could be desired behaviour).

    So there is still no way to access GitLab's subgroup's repositories from YouTrack :(

    0 0

    Reporter Alexander Volfman (Alexander.Volfman) Alexander Volfman (Alexander.Volfman)
    Created Feb 21, 2018 1:18:21 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 2:32:15 PM
    Resolved Feb 21, 2018 1:30:03 PM
    State Verified
    Assignee Alexander Volfman (Alexander.Volfman)
    Subsystem GitLab Integration
    Type Bug
    Priority Normal
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions 2018.1
    Affected versions Unknown
    That will result in choosing v4 as a API version even if there's no such API version available on the server.

    0 0
  • 10/31/18--04:32: JT-50088: -15
  • Reporter Exception Robot (app_exception) Exception Robot (app_exception)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 2:29:59 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 2:32:22 PM
    Resolved Oct 31, 2018 2:32:22 PM
    State Duplicate
    Assignee Unassigned
    Subsystem No Subsystem
    Type Exception
    Priority Major
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions 2018.3
    Original content visible to jetbrains team only for security reasons

    0 0

    Reporter Nikolay Revin (nikolay.revin) Nikolay Revin (nikolay.revin)
    Created Sep 25, 2017 5:02:51 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 2:33:03 PM
    Resolved Nov 22, 2017 2:00:04 AM
    State Verified
    Assignee Alexander Volfman (Alexander.Volfman)
    Subsystem GitLab Integration
    Type Bug
    Priority Normal
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions 2017.4.37933
    Affected versions Unknown
    Gitlab v10 is out and v3 API is due to be removed in Gitlab v11.

    Please address this request as soon as possible.

    https://about.gitlab.com/2017/09/22/gitlab-10-0-released/#api-v3

    0 0

    Reporter Jan Burse (janburse2) Jan Burse (janburse2)
    Created Oct 29, 2018 2:55:32 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 2:38:41 PM
    State Wait for Reply
    Assignee Anastasia Bartasheva (ana.bartasheva)
    Subsystem No Subsystem
    Type Support Request
    Priority Normal
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions Unknown

    I got the following notification. Some weeks before there was already another
    notification, the problem is the same now:

    IDEA-147206
    Customizing Icons for HiDPI Created by you
    Relates to IDEA-201348 Cannot use custom hiDPI (@2x) icons for touch bar
    IDEA-199448 It's not clear which icon size is acceptable to be set for action
    You () received this message because you had enabled notifications for: Reported by me saved search. To unsubscribe, you can mute notifications for this issue or edit your notification preferences. Sincerely yours, YouTrack 2018.3 (build #46698)

    When I try the mute notifications link or the edit your notification link, I get the
    following error (see screenshot). How can I mute or edit notifications?


    0 0

    Reporter Anna Zhdan (Anna.Zhdan) Anna Zhdan (Anna.Zhdan)
    Created Oct 29, 2018 5:32:20 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 3:03:27 PM
    State In Progress
    Assignee Alexander Anisimov (xi-eye)
    Subsystem Global Navigation
    Type Task
    Priority Normal
    Fix versions Unscheduled

    0 0

    Reporter Anna Zhdan (Anna.Zhdan) Anna Zhdan (Anna.Zhdan)
    Created Oct 29, 2018 5:46:41 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 3:20:39 PM
    Resolved Oct 31, 2018 3:20:39 PM
    State Fixed
    Assignee Andrey Skladchikov (Andrey.Skladchikov)
    Subsystem No Subsystem
    Type Task
    Priority Normal
    Fix versions Unscheduled

    0 0

    Reporter Leonid Stryuk (Leonid.Stryuk) Leonid Stryuk (Leonid.Stryuk)
    Created Oct 31, 2018 3:36:18 PM
    Updated Oct 31, 2018 3:36:18 PM
    State In Progress
    Assignee Leonid Stryuk (Leonid.Stryuk)
    Subsystem Core Functionality
    Type Bug
    Priority Normal
    Browser Any Browser
    OS Any OS
    Fix versions Unscheduled
    Affected versions Unknown

older | 1 | .... | 3029 | 3030 | (Page 3031) | 3032 | 3033 | .... | 3119 | newer