JT-50953: Add event about change work item author to event bus

December 21, 2018, 4:42 am

≫ Next: JT-50954: Tag hints: show visibility instead of repeating the tag itself

≪ Previous: JT-50775: Move feature tip popups from localStorage to the new rest

Reporter	Maksim Ryzhikov (maksimrv)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 3:41:54 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 3:42:04 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Single Issue View
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

↧

JT-50954: Tag hints: show visibility instead of repeating the tag itself

December 21, 2018, 4:48 am

≫ Next: JT-50955: Own comments received via live update are often not rendered

≪ Previous: JT-50953: Add event about change work item author to event bus

Reporter	Leonid Bushuev (Leonid.Bushuev)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 3:47:47 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 3:48:17 PM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Usability Problem
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

Currently the hint on a tag duplicates the tag itself. I guess it's made to show full tag text when the tag is too long, but too long tags is a kind of functionality misusage at all (better to limit tag length).

Better to show tag visibility in this hint.

↧

JT-50955: Own comments received via live update are often not rendered

December 21, 2018, 4:52 am

≫ Next: JT-50014: Manual testing

≪ Previous: JT-50954: Tag hints: show visibility instead of repeating the tag itself

Reporter	Roman Kolobov (rekolobov)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 3:52:32 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 3:52:32 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Single Issue View
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

2018.4.48115+

It also seems to affect apply command, which is rather inconvenient

STR 1:

Open any issue in two adjacent tabs (logged in as the same user)
Add comment in one tab
Switch to other one

AR: you never see the comment you have added in the first tab until you refresh the page
ER: new comment is shown in both tabs

STR 2:

Create fresh empty issue in JT (e.g. on staging) without setting any fields
Open SIV from step 1
Open command dialog
Apply the following command (it doesn't work with arbitrary command, it seems)
open add board youtrack subsystem Single Issue View component Frontend component Shortcuts & Navigation tag regression-youtrack
with any comment (e.g. test comment)

AR: I don't see my own comment
ER: I see my comment

↧

JT-50014: Manual testing

December 21, 2018, 4:58 am

≫ Next: JT-50778: Allow hiding sensitive data from the history records after editing issue summary/decription

≪ Previous: JT-50955: Own comments received via live update are often not rendered

Reporter	Anna Zhdan (Anna.Zhdan)
Created	Oct 29, 2018 5:41:12 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 3:58:33 PM
Resolved	Dec 21, 2018 3:26:39 PM
State	Verified
Assignee	Mikhail Kapusta (Mikhail.Kapusta)
Subsystem	Issue List
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

↧

JT-50778: Allow hiding sensitive data from the history records after editing issue summary/decription

December 21, 2018, 4:59 am

≫ Next: JT-44823: Live update doesn't work for activity stream on agile board

≪ Previous: JT-50014: Manual testing

Reporter	Anastasia Bartasheva (ana.bartasheva)
Created	Dec 10, 2018 5:30:09 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 3:59:01 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Pavel Nikolaev (pasha)
Subsystem	History
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

Now, if I edit an issue and delete sensitive data from it, it is still visible in the issue history tab

↧

JT-44823: Live update doesn't work for activity stream on agile board

December 21, 2018, 5:01 am

≫ Next: JT-50956: Try to optimize issuesGetter

≪ Previous: JT-50778: Allow hiding sensitive data from the history records after editing issue summary/decription

Reporter	Ekaterina Alekseeva (Ekaterina.Alekseeva)
Created	Dec 11, 2017 7:36:48 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 4:01:19 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Agile Board
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

build 38167

STR:

Open some card on the agile board
Open the same issue in another tab, no matter, as v2/issue or as a card on the board. Make some change.
Return to first tab

AR: changes are not shown in activity stream until manual refresh

↧

JT-50956: Try to optimize issuesGetter

December 21, 2018, 5:54 am

≫ Next: JT-50957: Show "apply changes" button on a sticky toolbar after changing project settings

≪ Previous: JT-44823: Live update doesn't work for activity stream on agile board

Reporter	Roman Kolobov (rekolobov)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 4:47:25 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 4:54:28 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Issue Links
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

2018.4.48115

Currently it's rather slow on cache miss (e.g. switching projects on new issue list on cold instance), I constantly get timings beyond 500ms, sometimes above 1500ms.
This is relatively slow compared to old issues list on a cold staging.
I see quite a lot of time spent in IssueComment.canAccess() and IssueAttachment.canAccess() -- apparently, for rendering attachments(id,name),comments(id).

Snapshot attached.

↧

JT-50957: Show "apply changes" button on a sticky toolbar after changing project settings

December 21, 2018, 6:05 am

≫ Next: JT-50959: Rocket.chat integration

≪ Previous: JT-50956: Try to optimize issuesGetter

Reporter	Ekaterina Alekseeva (Ekaterina.Alekseeva)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 5:00:08 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 5:05:10 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Max Maximov (Maxim.Maximov)
Subsystem	Projects
Type	Usability Problem
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

build 48219

STR:

Go to some project's settings (tab General)
Make some changes (update name, owner or toggle "Custom project template", something from top part of the page)

AR:
Somewhere on the bottom of the page "Apply changes" button appears, but it is not visible without scrolling the page down. So it's not obvious that user should do something to make the change saved (especially in case of toggler, because "template" badge appears immediately and it seems that change is already applied and saved).

ER:
After updating of any option, if appeared button is outside the visible area, there should be sticky toolbar with this button (like on Global settings page)

↧

JT-50959: Rocket.chat integration

December 21, 2018, 6:22 am

≫ Next: JT-50958: No checkbox "collect total spent time from subtasks" on creation of time report

≪ Previous: JT-50957: Show "apply changes" button on a sticky toolbar after changing project settings

Reporter	Evgeny Naumenko (jk)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 5:22:39 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 5:22:39 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Integrations
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

https://rocket.chat
On a par with Slack integration

↧

JT-50958: No checkbox "collect total spent time from subtasks" on creation of time report

December 21, 2018, 6:39 am

≫ Next: JT-50747: Rethink link issue interface

≪ Previous: JT-50959: Rocket.chat integration

Reporter	Ekaterina Alekseeva (Ekaterina.Alekseeva)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 5:21:32 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 5:39:55 PM
Resolved	Dec 21, 2018 5:39:51 PM
State	Fixed
Assignee	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

build 48219

STR:

Start creating new time report
Type some issue filter

ER:
Checkbox "collect total spent time from subtasks of issues that match the filter" appeared

AR:
It appears only while editing of existing time report

↧

JT-50747: Rethink link issue interface

December 21, 2018, 7:50 am

≫ Next: JT-50887: Update control for custom project template option

≪ Previous: JT-50958: No checkbox "collect total spent time from subtasks" on creation of time report

Reporter	Alexander Zolotov (zolotov)
Created	Dec 9, 2018 2:27:07 AM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 6:50:18 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Dmitry Gizatov (mitya)
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Usability Problem
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

The new interface makes the most common scenario for me impossible to perform.
Usually, it took couple clicks (four steps overall) to me to mark some issue as a duplicate:

click link icon
choose "duplicate"
paste issue number
press enter

Now it's a ridiculously long way to do the same:

click link icon
wait until popup is loaded (3 sec)
click "relates to" link
choose "duplicate" link
wait until search is performed
paste issue number
press enter
wait until search is performed
select the issue from the list (might be a lot of issues there)
click Link button

I know I can use Commands for this, still, it looks like a huge regression. Are you sure it would be more convenient for users? What problems were actually solved with the new interface?

↧

JT-50887: Update control for custom project template option

December 21, 2018, 7:54 am

≫ Next: JT-50961: Misleading "Delete workflow" button on WF rule edit page.

≪ Previous: JT-50747: Rethink link issue interface

Reporter	Scott Adams (Scott.Adams)
Created	Dec 18, 2018 5:46:54 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 6:54:50 PM
Resolved	Dec 19, 2018 6:13:56 PM
State	Verified
Assignee	Evgeny Naumenko (jk)
Subsystem	Projects
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	2018.4

Please replace checkbox with toggle.

↧

JT-50961: Misleading "Delete workflow" button on WF rule edit page.

December 21, 2018, 8:22 am

≫ Next: JT-50960: Team group is not added to Assignee field after project creation

≪ Previous: JT-50887: Update control for custom project template option

Reporter	Sergey Andreev (smandreev)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 7:22:53 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 7:22:53 PM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Usability Problem
Priority	Critical
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

YouTrack 2018.4, Build 48115

Use case: delete some obsolete workflow rules.

Open list of attached WFs of some Project in YT.
Expand WF node, find appropriate rule for deletion, select it
Expected: see any "Delete" button, but there I can only Attach, Import, Activeate/Deactivate

OK, open selected Rule for edit.
Editor opened with red "Delete workflow" button in upper-right corner.
Looks like this is what we are looking for...

Click the button

Expected: opened rule should be deleted
Result: Full node with workflow rules deleted.

↧

JT-50960: Team group is not added to Assignee field after project creation

December 21, 2018, 8:29 am

≫ Next: JT-50962: Unexpected root page type: -120

≪ Previous: JT-50961: Misleading "Delete workflow" button on WF rule edit page.

Reporter	Alexander Buturlinov (alexander.buturlinov)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 6:03:01 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 7:29:05 PM
Resolved	Dec 21, 2018 7:29:05 PM
State	Fixed
Assignee	Evgeny Naumenko (jk)
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Bug
Priority	Major
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

STR:

Start YT with empty database
Create a project (or clone)

ER: Assignee field bundle contains the team group
AR: Assignee field bundle is empty

Also, there is an exception in logs on project creation:

[root@127.0.0.1] project XX created                                                                                                                                                                                        [173/1814]
17:49:54,019 INFO  [@qtp758705033-85] [security                      ] [root@127.0.0.1] group XX Team created
17:49:54,033 ERROR [@qtp758705033-85] [EventsMultiplexer             ] [root@127.0.0.1] Exception while notifying entity listener.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: team.ownUsers must not be null
        at jetbrains.youtrack.ring.sync.RingTeam.resolveAndSync(RingTeam.kt:53) ~[youtrack-ring-integration-2018.4.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.ring.listeners.db.ProjectEntityListener.added(ProjectEntityListener.kt:32) ~[youtrack-ring-integration-2018.4.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.ring.listeners.db.ProjectEntityListener.added(ProjectEntityListener.kt:19) ~[youtrack-ring-integration-2018.4.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.ring.listeners.db.HubReplicatingXdEntityAdapter$addedSync$1.invoke(HubReplicatingXdEntityAdapter.kt:15) ~[youtrack-ring-integration-2018.4.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.ring.listeners.db.HubReplicatingXdEntityAdapter$addedSync$1.invoke(HubReplicatingXdEntityAdapter.kt:11) ~[youtrack-ring-integration-2018.4.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.ring.RingAuditLog.withActivity(RingAuditLog.kt:28) ~[youtrack-ring-integration-2018.4.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.ring.listeners.db.HubReplicatingXdEntityAdapter.addedSync(HubReplicatingXdEntityAdapter.kt:15) ~[youtrack-ring-integration-2018.4.jar:?]
        at kotlinx.dnq.listener.EntityListenerWrapper.addedSync(LegacyEventMultiplexerUtils.kt:57) ~[dnq-1.2.406.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime.listeners.EventsMultiplexerProxyImpl$ListenerDelegate$4.invoke(EventsMultiplexerProxyImpl.java:85) ~[jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime-3452.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime.listeners.EventsMultiplexerProxyImpl$ListenerDelegate$4.invoke(EventsMultiplexerProxyImpl.java:83) ~[jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime-3452.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime.listeners.EventsMultiplexerProxyImpl$ListenerDelegate.delegate(EventsMultiplexerProxyImpl.java:193) ~[jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime-3452.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime.listeners.EventsMultiplexerProxyImpl$ListenerDelegate.addedSync(EventsMultiplexerProxyImpl.java:83) ~[jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime-3452.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.exodus.entitystore.EventsMultiplexer$handleChange$7.invoke(EventsMultiplexer.kt:215) ~[dnq-transient-store-1.2.406.jar:1.2.3513]
        at jetbrains.exodus.entitystore.EventsMultiplexer$handleChange$7.invoke(EventsMultiplexer.kt:29) ~[dnq-transient-store-1.2.406.jar:1.2.3513]
        at jetbrains.exodus.entitystore.EventsMultiplexer.visit(EventsMultiplexer.kt:230) [dnq-transient-store-1.2.406.jar:1.2.3513]
        at jetbrains.exodus.entitystore.EventsMultiplexer.visit$default(EventsMultiplexer.kt:226) [dnq-transient-store-1.2.406.jar:1.2.3513]
        at jetbrains.exodus.entitystore.EventsMultiplexer.handleChange(EventsMultiplexer.kt:215) [dnq-transient-store-1.2.406.jar:1.2.3513]
        at jetbrains.exodus.entitystore.EventsMultiplexer.handlePerEntityTypeChanges(EventsMultiplexer.kt:196) [dnq-transient-store-1.2.406.jar:1.2.3513]
        at jetbrains.exodus.entitystore.EventsMultiplexer.fire$dnq_transient_store(EventsMultiplexer.kt:74) [dnq-transient-store-1.2.406.jar:1.2.3513]
        at jetbrains.exodus.entitystore.EventsMultiplexer.flushed(EventsMultiplexer.kt:47) [dnq-transient-store-1.2.406.jar:1.2.3513]
        at com.jetbrains.teamsys.dnq.database.TransientSessionImpl.notifyFlushedListeners(TransientSessionImpl.kt:776) [dnq-transient-store-1.2.406.jar:?]
        at com.jetbrains.teamsys.dnq.database.TransientSessionImpl.flush(TransientSessionImpl.kt:206) [dnq-transient-store-1.2.406.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.mps.webr.rpc.rest.filter.runtime.TransactionalResourceFilter.filter(TransactionalResourceFilter.java:71) [jetbrains.mps.webr.rpc.rest.filter.runtime-3452.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.server.ContainerFilteringStage$ResponseFilterStage.apply(ContainerFilteringStage.java:196) [jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.server.ContainerFilteringStage$ResponseFilterStage.apply(ContainerFilteringStage.java:163) [jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.process.internal.Stages.process(Stages.java:171) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime$Responder.processResponse(ServerRuntime.java:442) [jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime$Responder.process(ServerRuntime.java:434) [jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime$2.run(ServerRuntime.java:329) [jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors$1.call(Errors.java:271) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors$1.call(Errors.java:267) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(Errors.java:315) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(Errors.java:297) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(Errors.java:267) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.process.internal.RequestScope.runInScope(RequestScope.java:317) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime.process(ServerRuntime.java:305) [jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.server.ApplicationHandler.handle(ApplicationHandler.java:1154) [jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.WebComponent.serviceImpl(WebComponent.java:473) [jersey-container-servlet-core-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.WebComponent.service(WebComponent.java:427) [jersey-container-servlet-core-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.servlets.GapRestServlet.service(GapRestServlet.kt:76) [youtrack-webapp-2018.4.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer.service(ServletContainer.java:341) [jersey-container-servlet-core-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer.service(ServletContainer.java:228) [jersey-container-servlet-core-2.22.2.jar:?]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:848) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1772) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.SecurityResponseHeadersFilter.doFilter(SecurityResponseHeadersFilter.kt:18) [youtrack-webapp-2018.4.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.FilterAdapter.doFilter(FilterAdapter.kt:25) [youtrack-webapp-2018.4.jar:?]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.LoggingServletRequestFilter.doFilter(LoggingServletRequestFilter.kt:33) [youtrack-webapp-2018.4.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.FilterAdapter.doFilter(FilterAdapter.kt:25) [youtrack-webapp-2018.4.jar:?]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.gaprest.filters.HttpContextAccessorFilter.doFilter(HttpContextAccessorFilter.kt:22) [youtrack-gap-rest-2018.4.jar:?]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.MdcProviderServletFilter.doFilter(MdcProviderServletFilter.kt:17) [youtrack-webapp-2018.4.jar:?]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at webr.framework.controller.BaseApplicationServletFilter.doFilter(BaseApplicationServletFilter.java:24) [jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime-3452.jar:?]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:582) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:143) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:548) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:226) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1180) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:512) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:185) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1112) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.gzip.GzipHandler.handle(GzipHandler.java:493) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:213) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:134) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:534) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.standalone.instrumentation.InstrumentingServer.handle(InstrumentingServer.java:40) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:320) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:251) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:283) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:108) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.io.SelectChannelEndPoint$2.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:93) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:303) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589) [youtrack.jar:2018.4.48229]
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [?:1.8.0_151]

↧

JT-50962: Unexpected root page type: -120

December 21, 2018, 8:30 am

≫ Next: JT-50913: Manual testing

≪ Previous: JT-50960: Team group is not added to Assignee field after project creation

Reporter	Exception Robot (app_exception)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 7:30:55 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 7:30:55 PM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Exception
Priority	Major
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	2018.3

Original content visible to jetbrains team only for security reasons

↧

JT-50913: Manual testing

December 21, 2018, 8:39 am

≫ Next: JT-50426: Issue timer can use only one assignee

≪ Previous: JT-50962: Unexpected root page type: -120

Reporter	Ekaterina Zaikina (Ekaterina_Zaikina)
Created	Dec 19, 2018 2:58:16 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 7:39:20 PM
State	In Progress
Assignee	Mikhail Kapusta (Mikhail.Kapusta)
Subsystem	Issue Links
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

↧

JT-50426: Issue timer can use only one assignee

December 21, 2018, 8:40 am

≫ Next: JT-50876: User bundle values are not copied

≪ Previous: JT-50913: Manual testing

Reporter	Almaz Khamidullin (almaz1c)
Created	Nov 22, 2018 11:38:20 AM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 7:40:12 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Liubov Dievskaia (Liubov.Dievskaia)
Subsystem	Workflow
Type	Support Request
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

When issue has more than one assignee it isn't possible to track time by every assignee same time.
What if 2-3 assignees want to track time for task same time? For example we are collectively working
on same task at the same time and we want to track time using timer.

↧

JT-50876: User bundle values are not copied

December 21, 2018, 9:21 am

≫ Next: JT-50963: Time report: don't show group for report without grouping

≪ Previous: JT-50426: Issue timer can use only one assignee

Reporter	Alexander Buturlinov (alexander.buturlinov)
Created	Dec 18, 2018 1:51:43 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 8:21:21 PM
Resolved	Dec 19, 2018 10:21:47 PM
State	Verified
Assignee	Evgeny Naumenko (jk)
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	2018.4
Affected versions	Unknown

STR:

Open a project's settings (make sure it has some values except default in Assignee bundle, like a user or a group)
Clone the project

ER: Assignee fields bundle values are the same as in original project
AR: The bundle doesn't contain expected users/groups.

You can look into the attached database. There are two projects cloned, Clone of Sample Project and Clone of Test Project. Check Assignee bundle and Verifier (in the second project).

↧

JT-50963: Time report: don't show group for report without grouping

December 21, 2018, 9:27 am

≫ Next: JT-50964: Provide WF rule name for change in history

≪ Previous: JT-50876: User bundle values are not copied

Reporter	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 8:27:49 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 8:27:49 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

↧

JT-50964: Provide WF rule name for change in history

December 21, 2018, 9:28 am

≫ Next: JT-50411: attachment buttons are not visible in Dark Scheme

≪ Previous: JT-50963: Time report: don't show group for report without grouping

Reporter	Sergey Andreev (smandreev)
Created	Dec 21, 2018 8:28:47 PM
Updated	Dec 21, 2018 8:28:47 PM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Feature
Priority	Major
Fix versions	Unscheduled

A lot of rules collected with time and sometimes it is reaaly hard to distinguish real author of change.
It would be usefull to see name of rule that made change in history.

↧

Latest Images