| Reporter |
Alejandro Revilla (Alejandro.Revilla)
|
|---|---|
| Created | Jan 23, 2013 12:29:13 AM |
| Updated | Aug 9, 2013 7:22:31 PM |
| Priority | Normal |
| Type | Feature |
| State | Submitted |
| Assignee | Alexander Anisimov (xi-eye) |
| Subsystem | UI |
| Fix versions | Backlog |
| Fixed in builds | No Fixed in build |
| Affected versions | No Affected versions |
| Browser | Any Browser |
| OS | Any OS |
| Verified in build | Not verified |
| Verified by | Nobody |
| Reviewed by | No reviewed by |
| Severity | Routine |
It happens to us that users add a lot of side-dialogue to issues (like 'when is this issue going to be addressed?' kind of dialogue) that just adds noise to the list of comments that one needs to read once head down actually working on an issue. That's specially a problem with spaghetti issues that gets repurposed with follow-up related issues (a bad practice, but a reality).
It would be nice to have a 'talk' area (like MediaWiki has) or tag that one could add to a comment to flag it as 'talk' and an easy way to filtered those out.
This is extremely low priority, feel free to close it with 'won't fix', just wanted to share this idea in case you like it.
It would be nice to have a 'talk' area (like MediaWiki has) or tag that one could add to a comment to flag it as 'talk' and an easy way to filtered those out.
This is extremely low priority, feel free to close it with 'won't fix', just wanted to share this idea in case you like it.