JT-49812: Different view of wrong priority symbols in issues list on dashboard and in the ticket directly

October 17, 2018, 11:45 am

≫ Next: JT-49813: [Meta] No Datalore category

≪ Previous: JT-49650: Can't share dashboard with group

Reporter	Henri Höft (henrihoeft)
Created	Oct 17, 2018 9:45:59 PM
Updated	Oct 17, 2018 9:45:59 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Alexander Anisimov (xi-eye)
Subsystem	Single Issue View
Type	Cosmetics
Priority	Minor
Browser	Chrome, Firefox
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	2018.3.46358

What steps will reproduce the problem?

Create an issue list on the dashboard and show some tickets in the list, see screenshot 1
Open an ticket directly and see the sidebar where it shows the Priority name and an symbol, see screenshot 2
We have a different symbol on the dashboard and in the ticket and the symbol in the ticket is wrong, it shows for Critical bugs an "C" (German Version should be "K" which is showwn on the issues list)

↧

JT-49813: [Meta] No Datalore category

October 17, 2018, 3:02 pm

≫ Next: JT-49343: New users on youtrack.jebtrains.com have no saved searches in issues dropdown

≪ Previous: JT-49812: Different view of wrong priority symbols in issues list on dashboard and in the ticket directly

Reporter	Matthew Cowley (mattipv4)
Created	Oct 18, 2018 1:01:51 AM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 1:02:38 AM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

There currently is no datalore category on youtrack here.
Could one be created for it?

↧

JT-49343: New users on youtrack.jebtrains.com have no saved searches in issues dropdown

October 17, 2018, 3:36 pm

≫ Next: JT-49815: List of projects custom fields doesn't update after adding the first field to project

≪ Previous: JT-49813: [Meta] No Datalore category

Reporter	Evgeny Naumenko (jk)
Created	Sep 22, 2018 7:13:36 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 1:36:26 AM
Resolved	Sep 25, 2018 12:39:52 PM
State	Verified
Assignee	Anna Zhdan (Anna.Zhdan)
Subsystem	Search
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	2018.3.46358
Affected versions	Unknown

↧

JT-49815: List of projects custom fields doesn't update after adding the first field to project

October 17, 2018, 10:33 pm

≫ Next: JT-49814: Comment field doesn't receive focus when custom enum field is opened

≪ Previous: JT-49343: New users on youtrack.jebtrains.com have no saved searches in issues dropdown

Reporter	Дмитрий Хлопин (dmitriykhlopin)
Created	Oct 18, 2018 8:33:32 AM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 8:33:40 AM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	2018.3.46358

What steps will reproduce the problem?

Go to 'Custom fields -> Fields in project'.
Select project without custom fields.
Add existing field to project.
Check that nothing has changed in list of project, there is no indication that project has a custom field.
Refresh page.
Expand list of field of project from step 2.
Add another custom field.
Notice that field appears in list right away.

What is the expected result?
I expect to see that project has field on step 4.

What happens instead?
Nothing happens.

Video in attachment.

↧

JT-49814: Comment field doesn't receive focus when custom enum field is opened

October 17, 2018, 10:34 pm

≫ Next: JT-49816: Performance and access problems after update to 2018.3

≪ Previous: JT-49815: List of projects custom fields doesn't update after adding the first field to project

Reporter	Дмитрий Хлопин (dmitriykhlopin)
Created	Oct 18, 2018 8:17:20 AM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 8:34:00 AM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	2018.3.46358

What steps will reproduce the problem?

Create issue
Click on enum field
Click on comment field and start typing

What is the expected result?
I expect to see text in comment

What happens instead?
Text appears in filter of custom field

Video in attachment.

↧

JT-49816: Performance and access problems after update to 2018.3

October 17, 2018, 11:11 pm

≫ Next: JT-49817: Stackoverflow exception in few of our issues

≪ Previous: JT-49814: Comment field doesn't receive focus when custom enum field is opened

Reporter	Emelyanov Sergey (emelyanov_sn)
Created	Oct 18, 2018 8:43:57 AM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 9:11:59 AM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

I have standalone youtrack with reverse proxy (nginx).

Pages /admin/ring and /hub is unavailable, sometimes isuues and board does not load.

I make ssh tunnel from youtrack instance to http://localhost:8112 and page http://localhost:8112/admin/ring loading without any problems.

In nginx logs i see

2018/10/18 09:59:56 [error] 1036#0: *36318 no live upstreams while connecting to upstream, client: 192.168.0.120, server: localhost, request: "GET /hub/api/rest/settings/public?fields=id HTTP/1.1", upstream: "http://localhost/hub/api/rest/settings/public?fields=id", host: "youtrack.mydomain.ru", referrer: "https://youtrack.mydomain.ru/issue/Doctor-6110"

What is wrong?

↧

JT-49817: Stackoverflow exception in few of our issues

October 17, 2018, 11:44 pm

≫ Next: JT-49563: Browser navigation does not work

≪ Previous: JT-49816: Performance and access problems after update to 2018.3

Reporter	Roi Ezra (rezra3)
Created	Oct 18, 2018 9:44:05 AM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 9:44:05 AM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	2018.3.46358

What steps will reproduce the problem?

Open an issue

What is the expected result?
No error messages

What happens instead?
Error message is displayed

Caused by: java.lang.StackOverflowError
        at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.pcollections.IntTree.get(IntTree.java:93) ~[kotlin-reflect-1.2.70.jar:1.2.70-release-54 (1.2.70)]
        at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.pcollections.IntTree.get(IntTree.java:93) ~[kotlin-reflect-1.2.70.jar:1.2.70-release-54 (1.2.70)]
        at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.pcollections.IntTree.get(IntTree.java:93) ~[kotlin-reflect-1.2.70.jar:1.2.70-release-54 (1.2.70)]
        at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.pcollections.IntTree.get(IntTree.java:91) ~[kotlin-reflect-1.2.70.jar:1.2.70-release-54 (1.2.70)]
        at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.pcollections.IntTreePMap.get(IntTreePMap.java:42) ~[kotlin-reflect-1.2.70.jar:1.2.70-release-54 (1.2.70)]
        at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.pcollections.HashPMap.getEntries(HashPMap.java:85) ~[kotlin-reflect-1.2.70.jar:1.2.70-release-54 (1.2.70)]
        at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.pcollections.HashPMap.get(HashPMap.java:51) ~[kotlin-reflect-1.2.70.jar:1.2.70-release-54 (1.2.70)]
        at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.KClassCacheKt.getOrCreateKotlinClass(kClassCache.kt:32) ~[kotlin-reflect-1.2.70.jar:1.2.70-release-54 (1.2.70)]
        at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.ReflectionFactoryImpl.getOrCreateKotlinClass(ReflectionFactoryImpl.java:45) ~[kotlin-reflect-1.2.70.jar:1.2.70-release-54 (1.2.70)]
        at kotlin.jvm.internal.Reflection.getOrCreateKotlinClass(Reflection.java:50) ~[kotlin-runtime-1.2.70.jar:1.2.70-release-54 (1.2.70)]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.persistent.XdIssue$$special$$inlined$xdLink0_N_opposite_multi$3.invoke(LinkDelegates.kt:758) ~[youtrack-application-2018.3.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.persistent.XdIssue$$special$$inlined$xdLink0_N_opposite_multi$3.invoke(LinkDelegates.kt) ~[youtrack-application-2018.3.jar:?]
        at kotlinx.dnq.util.XdPropertyCachedProvider.provideDelegate(XdPropertyCachedProvider.kt:44) ~[dnq-1.2.388.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.persistent.XdIssue.<init>(XdIssue.kt:276) ~[youtrack-application-2018.3.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.persistent.XdIssue$Companion.naturalWrap(XdIssue.kt:44) ~[youtrack-application-2018.3.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.youtrack.persistent.XdIssue$Companion.naturalWrap(XdIssue.kt:30) ~[youtrack-application-2018.3.jar:?]
        at kotlinx.dnq.XdModel.toXd(XdModel.kt:137) ~[dnq-1.2.388.jar:?]
        at kotlinx.dnq.XdExtensionsKt.toXd(XdExtensions.kt:28) ~[dnq-1.2.388.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.charisma.persistent.Issue.getXdEntity(Issue.kt:80) ~[youtrack-application-2018.3.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.charisma.persistent.issue.IssueWatchers$hasStar$2$1.getValue(IssueWatchers.kt:54) ~[youtrack-application-2018.3.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.charisma.persistent.issue.IssueWatchers$hasStar$2$1.getValue(IssueWatchers.kt:52) ~[youtrack-application-2018.3.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.charisma.persistent.issue.IssueWatchers.getHasStar(IssueWatchers.kt) ~[youtrack-application-2018.3.jar:?]
        at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor445.invoke(Unknown Source) ~[?:?]
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) ~[?:1.8.0_181]
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) ~[?:1.8.0_181]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.FilterByProvidesWriter.serializeAsField(POJOSerializationFactory.kt:73) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeFields(BeanSerializerBase.java:719) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeFieldsFiltered(BeanSerializerBase.java:763) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeWithType(BeanSerializerBase.java:602) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.GapBeanSerializer.serializeWithType(GapBeanSerializer.kt:68) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.FilterByProvidesWriter.doWrite(POJOSerializationFactory.kt:134) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.FilterByProvidesWriter.serializeAsField(POJOSerializationFactory.kt:120) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeFields(BeanSerializerBase.java:719) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeFieldsFiltered(BeanSerializerBase.java:763) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeWithType(BeanSerializerBase.java:602) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.GapBeanSerializer.serializeWithType(GapBeanSerializer.kt:68) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.FilterByProvidesWriter.doWrite(POJOSerializationFactory.kt:134) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.FilterByProvidesWriter.serializeAsField(POJOSerializationFactory.kt:124) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeFields(BeanSerializerBase.java:719) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeFieldsFiltered(BeanSerializerBase.java:763) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeWithType(BeanSerializerBase.java:602) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.GapBeanSerializer.serializeWithType(GapBeanSerializer.kt:68) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.FilterByProvidesWriter.doWrite(POJOSerializationFactory.kt:134) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.FilterByProvidesWriter.serializeAsField(POJOSerializationFactory.kt:120) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeFields(BeanSerializerBase.java:719) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeFieldsFiltered(BeanSerializerBase.java:763) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase.serializeWithType(BeanSerializerBase.java:602) ~[jackson-databind-2.9.6.jar:2.9.6]
        at jetbrains.gap.resource.pojo.GapBeanSerializer.serializeWithType(GapBeanSerializer.kt:68) ~[gap-rest-874.jar:?]

```![](image.png)

↧

JT-49563: Browser navigation does not work

October 18, 2018, 12:45 am

≫ Next: JT-21260: tree view behaviour

≪ Previous: JT-49817: Stackoverflow exception in few of our issues

Reporter	Alexander Volfman (Alexander.Volfman)
Created	Oct 4, 2018 2:06:10 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 10:45:00 AM
Resolved	Oct 18, 2018 10:45:00 AM
State	Fixed
Assignee	Alexander Anisimov (xi-eye)
Subsystem	Issue List
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

STR:

search for something on the new issue list
modify the search string, press Enter
press Back

Browser URL is changed, but the application does not seem to be following it.

↧

JT-21260: tree view behaviour

October 18, 2018, 1:31 am

≫ Next: JT-49818: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.youtrack.timetracking.periodField.PeriodFieldWrapper.setValueString, parameter valueString

≪ Previous: JT-49563: Browser navigation does not work

Reporter	Paul Tanaskov (hebre)
Created	Aug 6, 2013 5:52:23 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 11:31:12 AM
State	Open
Assignee	Alexander Anisimov (xi-eye)
Subsystem	Issue List
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Backlog

It would be nice to have a basic tree functionality in tree view mode (collapse nodes as minimum)

Something like in JT-12068

↧

JT-49818: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.youtrack.timetracking.periodField.PeriodFieldWrapper.setValueString, parameter valueString

October 18, 2018, 1:33 am

≫ Next: JT-49819: Make line under links same colour as Activity block line

≪ Previous: JT-21260: tree view behaviour

Reporter	Exception Robot (app_exception)
Created	Oct 18, 2018 11:33:03 AM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 11:33:03 AM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Exception
Priority	Major
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	2018.2

Original content visible to jetbrains team only for security reasons

↧

JT-49819: Make line under links same colour as Activity block line

October 18, 2018, 1:57 am

≫ Next: JT-48973: Add comment

≪ Previous: JT-49818: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.youtrack.timetracking.periodField.PeriodFieldWrapper.setValueString, parameter valueString

Reporter	Dmitry Gizatov (mitya)
Created	Oct 18, 2018 11:57:55 AM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 11:57:55 AM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Issue Links
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

↧

JT-48973: Add comment

October 18, 2018, 2:08 am

≫ Next: JT-49696: Empty value for a field can't be set with a command

≪ Previous: JT-49819: Make line under links same colour as Activity block line

Reporter	Pavel Nikitin (pavel.nikitin)
Created	Sep 3, 2018 5:06:35 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 12:08:23 PM
Resolved	Sep 25, 2018 10:30:00 AM
State	Verified
Assignee	Alexander Anisimov (xi-eye)
Subsystem	Single Issue View
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

↧

JT-49696: Empty value for a field can't be set with a command

October 18, 2018, 2:08 am

≫ Next: JT-48893: Mandatory messages to be translated in new languages

≪ Previous: JT-48973: Add comment

Reporter	Michael Zarnitsa (mz)
Created	Oct 12, 2018 10:09:55 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 12:08:31 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Commands
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	2018.2.45513

What steps will reproduce the problem?

Custom field has an empty value "empty"
Search for that field with no empty values (field: -empty)
An issue with empty value comes up in search anyway

Looks like the source of the problem:

If I edit an issue and erase a field value and hit enter, it records empty value
1. Search field: -empty doesn't find this issue
If I apply a command on an issue "field empty" ("empty" being prompted as an empty value) it saves "empty" string in the field.
1. In such a case field: -empty search still shows this issue, even though it's value was supposed to be empty

So, looks like applying command to a field to assign it with empty value actually assigns a string to it, not empty value. This happens in the old as well as the new issue page.

Please see attached video

↧

JT-48893: Mandatory messages to be translated in new languages

October 18, 2018, 2:09 am

≫ Next: JT-48999: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.youtrack.timetracking.periodField.PeriodFieldWrapper.setValueString, parameter valueString

≪ Previous: JT-49696: Empty value for a field can't be set with a command

Reporter	Evgeny Naumenko (jk)
Created	Aug 28, 2018 5:01:41 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 12:09:22 PM
State	In Progress
Assignee	Natasha Katson (Natasha.Katson)
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

youtrack.scrum_types.bundle_name
youtrack.links.subtask.source_to_target
parser.punctuation.or
youtrack.state.wont_fix
youtrack.state.reopened
youtrack.type.cosmetics
youtrack.state.obsolete
predefined_field.links
youtrack.state.submitted
predefined_field.code
youtrack.state.in_progress
youtrack.subsystems.bundle_name
youtrack.groups.state.description
youtrack.states.unresolved
predefined_field.commented_by
predefined_field.comments
predefined_field.comment_text
predefined_field.votes
youtrack.state.ready_to_pull
predefined_command_type.comment
youtrack.dateperiod.yesterday
youtrack.state.duplicate
PredefinedCommandType.plusOne
youtrack.state.blocked
youtrack.group.reporters_name
youtrack.timetracking.spent_time
youtrack.priorities.bundle_name
youtrack.state.open
predefined_field.issue
youtrack.dateperiod.two_weeks_ago
youtrack.timetracking.estimation
youtrack.type.usability_problem
youtrack.state.backlog
youtrack.links.duplicate.source_to_target
youtrack.links.relates.name
predefined_command_type.remove
predefined_field.work
predefined_field.commented_at
youtrack.priority.show_stopper
parser.punctuation.and
youtrack.type.meta_issue
predefined_field.description
youtrack.state.test
youtrack.priority.major
predefined_field.attachments
predefined_field.attachment_name
youtrack.group.new_users_name
predefined_field.updated
youtrack.links.duplicate.name
youtrack.links.subtask.target_to_source
predefined_command_type.unstar
predefined_field.tag
youtrack.priority.minor
youtrack.dateperiod.this_week
youtrack.type.performance_problem
youtrack.dateperiod.sunday
predefined_field.vcs_changes
youtrack.dateperiod.thursday
predefined_field.project
youtrack.state.to_verify
youtrack.state.to_be_discussed
predefined_field.by
youtrack.state.done
yoturack.state.verified.description
predefined_field.sort_by
predefined_field.visible_to
youtrack.dateperiod.saturday
predefined_field.summary
predefined_field.custom
PredefinedCommandType.vote
youtrack.state.staging
youtrack.links.depend.source_to_target
youtrack.dateperiod.monday
youtrack.dateperiod.tuesday
youtrack.types.bundle_name
youtrack.type.auto_reported_exception
predefined_field.updated_by
predefined_command_type.add
youtrack.state.new
predefined_field.created
youtrack.type.epic
youtrack.type.feature
youtrack.state.fixed
youtrack.state.develop
predefined_field.has
youtrack.states.bundle_name
youtrack.dateperiod.today
youtrack.links.duplicate.target_to_source
youtrack.state.incomplete
youtrack.user.guest.name
predefined_field.star
youtrack.builds.bundle_name
youtrack.type.user_story
youtrack.state.cant_reproduce
youtrack.type.exception
youtrack.dateperiod.last_week
youtrack.state.release
youtrack.links.relates.source_to_target
predefined_command_type.delete
youtrack.dateperiod.friday
youtrack.links.subtask.name
youtrack.priority.normal
predefined_command_type.untag
predefined_field.saved_query
predefined_field.voted_by
youtrack.single_user_field_type.my
youtrack.user.root.name
youtrack.type.task
youtrack.group.all_users_name
youtrack.dateperiod.last_month
youtrack.dateperiod.this_month
youtrack.states.resolved
PredefinedCommandType.unvote
youtrack.dateperiod.three_weeks_ago
youtrack.dateperiod.wednesday
youtrack.state.verified
predefined_field.resolved
youtrack.priority.critical
youtrack.links.depend.target_to_source
youtrack.vesions.bundle_name
youtrack.single_user_field_type.me
predefined_field.context_folder
youtrack.dateperiod.older
youtrack.type.bug
predefined_field.action
youtrack.links.depend.name
youtrack.state.review
Folders.Star
Stop_timer.add_work_Today_{0}d{1}h{2}m
Stop_timer_switch_to_Stop.add_work_Today_{0}d{1}h{2}m
BoardSprintField.Board
predefined_field.similar_to

↧

JT-48999: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.youtrack.timetracking.periodField.PeriodFieldWrapper.setValueString, parameter valueString

October 18, 2018, 2:14 am

≫ Next: JT-49820: Improve searching by field empty values

≪ Previous: JT-48893: Mandatory messages to be translated in new languages

Reporter	Exception Robot (app_exception)
Created	Sep 4, 2018 5:16:17 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 12:14:23 PM
Resolved	Sep 4, 2018 5:57:40 PM
State	Verified
Assignee	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Subsystem	Time Tracking
Type	Exception
Priority	Major
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	2018.3.46358
Affected versions	2018.2

Original content visible to jetbrains team only for security reasons

↧

JT-49820: Improve searching by field empty values

October 18, 2018, 2:24 am

≫ Next: JT-49680: Exception when displaying issue history

≪ Previous: JT-48999: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.youtrack.timetracking.periodField.PeriodFieldWrapper.setValueString, parameter valueString

Reporter	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Created	Oct 18, 2018 12:24:25 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 12:24:34 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Anna Zhdan (Anna.Zhdan)
Subsystem	Search
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

Assume that we have:

string (primitive fields are also affected) field 'X' with empty value 'no x'
issue 'A' with value for field 'X' = 'no x' but this value is entered manually
search 'S' 'X: {no x}'

At the moment search 'S' will not return issue 'A' which should be fixed somehow either introducing another term for strict searching by values either adding issue A to search result and change suggestion text for {no X}

↧

JT-49680: Exception when displaying issue history

October 18, 2018, 2:26 am

≫ Next: JT-49822: "Last updated" timestamp is not updated after recalculating the widget

≪ Previous: JT-49820: Improve searching by field empty values

Reporter	Alexander Volfman (Alexander.Volfman)
Created	Oct 12, 2018 3:25:07 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 12:26:09 PM
State	Wait for Reply
Assignee	Pavel Nikolaev (pasha)
Subsystem	Single Issue View
Type	Exception
Priority	Critical
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

↧

JT-49822: "Last updated" timestamp is not updated after recalculating the widget

October 18, 2018, 2:45 am

≫ Next: JT-49821: Отзыв на новый интерфейс

≪ Previous: JT-49680: Exception when displaying issue history

Reporter	Anastasia Bartasheva (ana.bartasheva)
Created	Oct 18, 2018 12:44:57 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 12:45:09 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Andrey Skladchikov (Andrey.Skladchikov)
Subsystem	Dashboard & Widgets
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	2018.3.46358

STR:

Go to the Dashboard where you have a widget
Hover the recalculate button, the last updated date will be displayed (say 2 weeks ago)
Click on the recalculate button
Hover the recalculate button again

ER: Last updated date changed to "Moments ago"
AR: Last updated date is still "2 weeks ago"

Refresh doesn't help;
Going to the report, recalculating it and then refreshing the dashboard helps.

↧

JT-49821: Отзыв на новый интерфейс

October 18, 2018, 2:50 am

≫ Next: JT-49789: Apply new wording to team city bad command template

≪ Previous: JT-49822: "Last updated" timestamp is not updated after recalculating the widget

Reporter	Павел Богатырев (pfight77)
Created	Oct 18, 2018 12:27:50 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 12:50:07 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Dmitry Gizatov (mitya)
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Usability Problem
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

Прежние вкладки (комментарии/история/трекинг времени) были намного удобнее. Объясню. Допустим ты хочешь посмотреть комментарии - сейчас бывает так, что история карточки содержит много записей, и комментарии в ней теряются. Поэтому, чтобы просмотреть комментарии нужно щелкнуть 3 раза (отключить все остальное). Потом, допустим, тебе нужно потрекать время - приходится опять же либо скролить через всю историю вниз карточки (отображение сверху вниз неудобно), там еще кликнуть по специально ссылке - все это лишние движения. Раньше было достаточно 1 раз кликнуть по вкладке трекинга, и сразу было доступно поле для ввода часов.

↧

JT-49789: Apply new wording to team city bad command template

October 18, 2018, 3:19 am

≫ Next: JT-49788: Apply new wording to VCS bad user template

≪ Previous: JT-49821: Отзыв на новый интерфейс

Reporter	Scott Adams (Scott.Adams)
Created	Oct 16, 2018 6:40:06 PM
Updated	Oct 18, 2018 1:19:24 PM
Resolved	Oct 17, 2018 4:58:52 PM
State	Verified
Assignee	Anna Zhdan (Anna.Zhdan)
Subsystem	Notifications
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

Update TeamcityAdminNotificationCase.description = YouTrack can't find a user that matches the change author for a commit that is processed by the build server integration
Update subject line in teamcity_bad_command_subject.ftl: Commit message processed by integration with ${mapping.serverUrl} in ${mapping.project.name} contains unrecognized command
Update message text for teamcity_bad_command_email.ftl and teamcity_bad_command.ftl:

A command that was processed from a commit message by the integration with ${mapping.integrationName} in the ${mapping.project.name} project is not valid. The referenced issue was not updated.

To update the issue, open the issue in YouTrack and apply the desired changes manually.

↧

Latest Images