JT-18354: Add the ability to group Time Report by sub-tasks

November 26, 2018, 11:40 am

≫ Next: JT-34298: TimeReport - an option to group by Feature

≪ Previous: JT-18735: Time Report to include comments

Reporter	Valerie Andrianova (valerie.andrianova)
Created	Jan 29, 2013 4:32:33 PM
Updated	Nov 26, 2018 10:40:19 PM
Resolved	Nov 23, 2018 3:56:42 PM
State	Fixed
Assignee	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

Add the ability to group the issues in the Time Report by the Main parent issues and its sub-tasks:
Parent Issue - Estimated Time -Total Spent Time

Sub-task#1
Sub-task#2
Sub-task#3

etc.

↧

JT-34298: TimeReport - an option to group by Feature

November 26, 2018, 11:41 am

≫ Next: JT-50461: Time reports: grouping by multiple fields

≪ Previous: JT-18354: Add the ability to group Time Report by sub-tasks

Reporter	Jaroslav Urban (jaroslavurban)
Created	Mar 9, 2016 9:47:05 AM
Updated	Nov 26, 2018 10:41:03 PM
Resolved	Nov 26, 2018 10:40:19 PM
State	Duplicate
Assignee	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

It would come handy if it is possible to group the result for time report by feature itself. Now it can be grouped by type which is not desired effect. I would like to see the result where each feature displays list of spent work, similar to when it is grouped by WorkAuthor.

Thanks for consideration. Regards, Jaroslav

↧

JT-50461: Time reports: grouping by multiple fields

November 26, 2018, 11:42 am

≫ Next: JT-32294: Time report: group by project and subsystem

≪ Previous: JT-34298: TimeReport - an option to group by Feature

Reporter	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Created	Nov 23, 2018 4:51:12 PM
Updated	Nov 26, 2018 10:42:48 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

Introduce ability to group data by a few fields for Time and Time sheet report.

↧

JT-32294: Time report: group by project and subsystem

November 26, 2018, 11:43 am

≫ Next: JT-27927: Reports needs to have a better time frame selector

≪ Previous: JT-50461: Time reports: grouping by multiple fields

Reporter	Denis Bogdanas (desik2003)
Created	Oct 12, 2015 12:10:28 AM
Updated	Nov 26, 2018 10:43:23 PM
Resolved	Nov 26, 2018 10:42:48 PM
State	Duplicate
Assignee	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

I would like to be able to group my issues both by project and subsystem in one single time report. This might not make sense for big projects, but is valuable for small teams and individual projects.

Thank you.

↧

JT-27927: Reports needs to have a better time frame selector

November 26, 2018, 11:45 am

≫ Next: JT-50052: Investigate the issue with Bitbucket integration

≪ Previous: JT-32294: Time report: group by project and subsystem

Reporter	Andrea Sciamanna (sciamannikoo)
Created	Dec 1, 2014 11:57:36 PM
Updated	Nov 26, 2018 10:45:25 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

I love the new reports, I really do... except for a feature that I find not just annoying, but useless.

If I create any report that is somehow based on a time period, the only options I have are:

A period of time
This:
- week
- month
- year
- last week
- last month

Why I can't have options such as "last n days" and "last n months"?
Or this + last week/month at least?

And why you don't provide a mean to navigate through weeks and months?

Think of today (Dec 1st 2014): is the beginning of the week AND the beginning of the month and I can only see what happened today.
The only way to see something is to change the report, which simply makes no sense to me.

Thanks.

↧

JT-50052: Investigate the issue with Bitbucket integration

November 26, 2018, 1:21 pm

≫ Next: JT-50053: Provide the info How many issues have more than 50 links (%)

≪ Previous: JT-27927: Reports needs to have a better time frame selector

Reporter	Oleg Larshin (Oleg.Larshin)
Created	Oct 30, 2018 5:18:17 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 12:21:42 AM
Resolved	Nov 27, 2018 12:21:42 AM
State	Fixed
Assignee	Alexander Volfman (Alexander.Volfman)
Subsystem	Bitbucket Integration
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

There's a possibility that Bitbucket integration has stopped working in latest versions.

↧

JT-50053: Provide the info How many issues have more than 50 links (%)

November 26, 2018, 2:20 pm

≫ Next: JT-50523: Review wording

≪ Previous: JT-50052: Investigate the issue with Bitbucket integration

Reporter	Dmitry Gizatov (mitya)
Created	Oct 30, 2018 5:21:59 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 1:20:51 AM
State	Open
Assignee	Ekaterina Zaikina (Ekaterina_Zaikina)
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

↧

JT-50523: Review wording

November 26, 2018, 11:17 pm

≫ Next: JT-50524: fix excel export according to design review

≪ Previous: JT-50053: Provide the info How many issues have more than 50 links (%)

Reporter	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Created	Nov 27, 2018 10:17:00 AM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 10:17:00 AM
State	Open
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

↧

JT-50524: fix excel export according to design review

November 26, 2018, 11:17 pm

≫ Next: JT-17531: Show time remaining in Time Reports

≪ Previous: JT-50523: Review wording

Reporter	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Created	Nov 27, 2018 10:17:46 AM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 10:17:46 AM
State	Open
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Cosmetics
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

↧

JT-17531: Show time remaining in Time Reports

November 26, 2018, 11:21 pm

≫ Next: JT-43426: Design for duplicated issue

≪ Previous: JT-50524: fix excel export according to design review

Reporter	Ben Day (Ben.Day)
Created	Nov 18, 2012 10:18:36 AM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 10:21:53 AM
State	Open
Assignee	Alexey Volkov (Alexey.Volkov)
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

The time spent so far and the total estimated time is shown in time reports, but not the estimated amount of time left. It would be useful to include this.

↧

JT-43426: Design for duplicated issue

November 26, 2018, 11:22 pm

≫ Next: JT-50525: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.youtrack.timetracking.periodField.PeriodFieldWrapper.setValueString, parameter valueString

≪ Previous: JT-17531: Show time remaining in Time Reports

Reporter	Pavel Nikolaev (pasha)
Created	Sep 15, 2017 2:30:59 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 10:22:46 AM
State	Open
Assignee	Nastya Berezinskaya (Nastya.Berezinskaya)
Subsystem	Reports
Type	Task
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

If issue is included to several groups in Estimation report, the report should provide the following information:|

Issue has duplicates in other group (currently it's marked by asterisk)
In which groups issue is also included (currently such information provides tooltip)

↧

JT-50525: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.youtrack.timetracking.periodField.PeriodFieldWrapper.setValueString, parameter valueString

November 27, 2018, 12:04 am

≫ Next: JT-44953: Binary operator of too great depth

≪ Previous: JT-43426: Design for duplicated issue

Reporter	Exception Robot (app_exception)
Created	Nov 27, 2018 11:04:25 AM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 11:04:25 AM
State	Submitted
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Exception
Priority	Major
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	2018.2

Original content visible to jetbrains team only for security reasons

↧

JT-44953: Binary operator of too great depth

November 27, 2018, 12:15 am

≫ Next: JT-46563: Permalinks to comments don't work in new FSI if the target comment requires "Loading more"

≪ Previous: JT-50525: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.youtrack.timetracking.periodField.PeriodFieldWrapper.setValueString, parameter valueString

Reporter	Pavel Nikitin (pavel.nikitin)
Created	Dec 19, 2017 1:32:33 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 11:15:29 AM
State	Open
Assignee	Pavel Nikitin (pavel.nikitin)
Subsystem	Core Functionality
Type	Performance Problem
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

java.lang.Throwable

...

java.lang.Throwable at jetbrains.exodus.query.BinaryOperator.<init>(BinaryOperator.java:58) at jetbrains.exodus.query.CommutativeOperator.<init>(CommutativeOperator.java:23) at jetbrains.exodus.query.Or.<init>(Or.java:24) at jetbrains.exodus.query.QueryEngine.union(QueryEngine.java:191) at jetbrains.teamsys.dnq.runtime.queries.TransientQueryEngine.union(TransientQueryEngine.java:184) at jetbrains.teamsys.dnq.runtime.queries.QueryOperations.union(QueryOperations.java:63) at jetbrains.charisma.persistent.IssueCommentImpl.applyReadPermissions(IssueCommentImpl.java:315) at jetbrains.youtrack.persistent.filter.FilterUtilKt.applyReadPermissions(FilterUtil.kt:18) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.keyword.predefined.fields.PredefinedFieldCommented.filterIssuesByPeriod(PredefinedFieldCommented.kt:21) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.keyword.predefined.DatePredefinedField.filter(DatePredefinedField.kt:28) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.IssuesSearchRequestExecutor.getValue(IssuesSearchRequestExecutor.java:42) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.IssuesSearchRequestExecutor.getValue(IssuesSearchRequestExecutor.java:26) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.SearchRequestExecutor.appendCategorizedValueIssues(SearchRequestExecutor.java:246) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.SearchRequestExecutor.filterRequestTerm(SearchRequestExecutor.java:173) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.SearchRequestExecutor.filterAndOperand(SearchRequestExecutor.java:105) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.SearchRequestExecutor.filterAndExpression(SearchRequestExecutor.java:92) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.SearchRequestExecutor.filterOrExpression(SearchRequestExecutor.java:81) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.SearchRequestExecutor.filterSearchRequest(SearchRequestExecutor.java:73) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.SearchRequestExecutor.filter(SearchRequestExecutor.java:49) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.ParseResult.getIssues(ParseResult.java:65) at jetbrains.youtrack.search.parser.ParseResult.getIssues(ParseResult.java:36) at jetbrains.charisma.parser.search.RequestBuilderImpl.issues(RequestBuilderImpl.kt:55) at jetbrains.charisma.rest.RestUtil.getFilteredIssues(RestUtil.java:95) at jetbrains.charisma.rest.IssueResource.getIssuesForSearch(IssueResource.java:574) at jetbrains.charisma.rest.IssueResource.get(IssueResource.java:177) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor610.invoke(Unknown Source)```

↧

JT-46563: Permalinks to comments don't work in new FSI if the target comment requires "Loading more"

November 27, 2018, 12:15 am

≫ Next: JT-49899: How can I setup G1 GC garbage collector in Youtrack?

≪ Previous: JT-44953: Binary operator of too great depth

Reporter	Jura Gorohovsky (gorohoroh)
Created	Apr 4, 2018 4:45:14 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 11:15:56 AM
State	Open
Assignee	Maksim Ryzhikov (maksimrv)
Subsystem	Single Issue View
Type	Bug
Priority	Major
Browser	Firefox
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	2018.1.41561
Affected versions	Unknown

Take an issue with many comments, copy a permalink to a comment that is not included in the set of comments that load automatically; open the permalink with the new FSI.

Expected: YouTrack auto-loads as many comments as necessary to show and select the target comment
Actual: Only the default issue view is shown, and the target comment is hidden beneath "Load more"

↧

JT-49899: How can I setup G1 GC garbage collector in Youtrack?

November 27, 2018, 12:16 am

≫ Next: JT-50413: Touch for drag and drop doesn't work on agile boards

≪ Previous: JT-46563: Permalinks to comments don't work in new FSI if the target comment requires "Loading more"

Reporter	OLUWATOSIN ADEGBAMIGBE (tosinbabs)
Created	Oct 23, 2018 7:24:16 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 11:16:30 AM
Resolved	Nov 27, 2018 11:16:30 AM
State	Obsolete
Assignee	Roman Kolobov (rekolobov)
Subsystem	Commands
Type	Support Request
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

We would like enable G1 GC garbage collector for our Youtrack and needs guidelines on how to go about it .

↧

JT-50413: Touch for drag and drop doesn't work on agile boards

November 27, 2018, 12:33 am

≫ Next: JT-38904: Add `last comment by` keyword

≪ Previous: JT-49899: How can I setup G1 GC garbage collector in Youtrack?

Reporter	Pavel Nikitin (pavel.nikitin)
Created	Nov 21, 2018 7:12:07 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 11:33:51 AM
State	Open
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Agile Board
Type	Task
Priority	Major
Fix versions	Unscheduled

↧

JT-38904: Add `last comment by` keyword

November 27, 2018, 12:36 am

≫ Next: JT-50463: Spontaneous reload of full screen issue pages

≪ Previous: JT-50413: Touch for drag and drop doesn't work on agile boards

Reporter	Anton Konovalov (extempl)
Created	Nov 25, 2016 8:20:09 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 11:36:00 AM
State	Open
Assignee	Pavel Nikolaev (pasha)
Subsystem	Search
Type	Feature
Priority	Normal
Fix versions	Unscheduled

Mostly it is about State Waiting for Reply.
For example, I remember that there is an issue created by me where last comment was added by other user, but can't actually find this issue easily (without proper state set).
Yes, I can sort by updated, filter with has: comments but this won't be really accurate or search emails for comment update, but that is not really accurate/handy.

↧

JT-50463: Spontaneous reload of full screen issue pages

November 27, 2018, 1:19 am

≫ Next: JT-50526: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.charisma.customfields.oldRest.enumeration.OldRestEnumsBundleResource.postBundleName, parameter newName

≪ Previous: JT-38904: Add `last comment by` keyword

Reporter	Yegor Yarko (yaegor)
Created	Nov 23, 2018 5:52:06 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 12:19:17 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Andrey Skladchikov (Andrey.Skladchikov)
Subsystem	No Subsystem
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

Since more than a month already on youtrack.jetbrains.com I face issue when the currently opened page reloads itself without any actions from my side.
Sometimes I was just typing the comment text and sometimes just did nothing.

I managed to capture the requests during such reload.

↧

JT-50526: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.charisma.customfields.oldRest.enumeration.OldRestEnumsBundleResource.postBundleName, parameter newName

November 27, 2018, 1:31 am

≫ Next: JT-47928: When field is mandatory only when condition is met, it is impossible to change the field

≪ Previous: JT-50463: Spontaneous reload of full screen issue pages

Reporter	Roman Kolobov (rekolobov)
Created	Nov 27, 2018 12:30:23 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 12:31:14 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Unassigned
Subsystem	Deprecated REST API
Type	Exception
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

2018.3.47247

REST exception for URL: /youtrack/rest/admin/customfield/bundle/<redacted>

...

REST exception for URL: /youtrack/rest/admin/customfield/bundle/<redacted>
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.charisma.customfields.oldRest.enumeration.OldRestEnumsBundleResource.postBundleName, parameter newName
at jetbrains.charisma.customfields.oldRest.enumeration.OldRestEnumsBundleResource.postBundleName(OldRestEnumsBundleResource.kt) ~[charisma-customfields-2018.3.jar:?]
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.model.internal.ResourceMethodInvocationHandlerFactory$1.invoke(ResourceMethodInvocationHandlerFactory.java:81) ~[jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.model.internal.AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher$1.run(AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher.java:144) ~[jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.model.internal.AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher.invoke(AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher.java:161) ~[jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.model.internal.JavaResourceMethodDispatcherProvider$ResponseOutInvoker.doDispatch(JavaResourceMethodDispatcherProvider.java:160) ~[jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.model.internal.AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher.dispatch(AbstractJavaResourceMethodDispatcher.java:99) ~[jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.model.ResourceMethodInvoker.invoke(ResourceMethodInvoker.java:389) ~[jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.model.ResourceMethodInvoker.apply(ResourceMethodInvoker.java:347) ~[jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.model.ResourceMethodInvoker.apply(ResourceMethodInvoker.java:102) ~[jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime$2.run(ServerRuntime.java:326) [jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors$1.call(Errors.java:271) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors$1.call(Errors.java:267) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(Errors.java:315) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(Errors.java:297) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(Errors.java:267) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.process.internal.RequestScope.runInScope(RequestScope.java:317) [jersey-common-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime.process(ServerRuntime.java:305) [jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.server.ApplicationHandler.handle(ApplicationHandler.java:1154) [jersey-server-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.WebComponent.serviceImpl(WebComponent.java:473) [jersey-container-servlet-core-2.22.2.jar:?]
at org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.WebComponent.service(WebComponent.java:427) [jersey-container-servlet-core-2.22.2.jar:?]
at jetbrains.mps.webr.rpc.rest.provider.misc.DefaultRestRequestHandler.handle(DefaultRestRequestHandler.java:207) [jetbrains.mps.webr.rpc.rest.provider-3438.jar:?]
at jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime.requestProcessor.RestRequestProcessor.processRequest(RestRequestProcessor.java:47) [jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime-3438.jar:?]
at jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime.servlet.MainServlet.processRequest(MainServlet.java:225) [jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime-3438.jar:?]
at jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime.servlet.MainServlet.doGet(MainServlet.java:141) [jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime-3438.jar:?]
at jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime.servlet.MainServlet.doPost(MainServlet.java:189) [jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime-3438.jar:?]
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:707) [javax.servlet-api-3.1.0.jar:3.1.0]
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790) [javax.servlet-api-3.1.0.jar:3.1.0]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:848) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1772) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.RootGoFilter.doFilter(RootGoFilter.kt:53) [youtrack-webapp-2018.3.jar:?]
at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.FilterAdapter.doFilter(FilterAdapter.kt:32) [youtrack-webapp-2018.3.jar:?]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.NewUIFilter.doFilter(NewUIFilter.kt:41) [youtrack-webapp-2018.3.jar:?]
at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.FilterAdapter.doFilter(FilterAdapter.kt:32) [youtrack-webapp-2018.3.jar:?]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.SetThreadLocalPrincipalFilter.doFilter(SetThreadLocalPrincipalFilter.kt:19) [youtrack-webapp-2018.3.jar:?]
at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.FilterAdapter.doFilter(FilterAdapter.kt:32) [youtrack-webapp-2018.3.jar:?]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.WebrSessionAuthenticationFilter.doFilter(WebrSessionAuthenticationFilter.kt:36) [youtrack-webapp-2018.3.jar:?]
at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.FilterAdapter.doFilter(FilterAdapter.kt:32) [youtrack-webapp-2018.3.jar:?]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime.filter.QueryParameterFilter.doFilter(QueryParameterFilter.java:25) [jetbrains.mps.webr.runtime-3438.jar:?]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.continuation.ContinuationFilter.doFilter(ContinuationFilter.java:127) [jetty-continuation-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.SecurityResponseHeadersFilter.doFilter(SecurityResponseHeadersFilter.kt:18) [youtrack-webapp-2018.3.jar:?]
at jetbrains.youtrack.webapp.filters.FilterAdapter.doFilter(FilterAdapter.kt:32) [youtrack-webapp-2018.3.jar:?]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1759) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:582) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:143) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:548) [jetty-security-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:226) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1180) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at jetbrains.hosted.server.WebApp$1.doHandle(WebApp.java:60) [server.jar:?]
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:512) [jetty-servlet-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:185) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1112) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:213) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at jetbrains.hosted.server.LoggingContextHandlerCollection.handle(LoggingContextHandlerCollection.java:18) [server.jar:?]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.gzip.GzipHandler.handle(GzipHandler.java:493) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:134) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:534) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:320) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:251) [jetty-server-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:283) [jetty-io-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:108) [jetty-io-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.io.SelectChannelEndPoint$2.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:93) [jetty-io-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:303) [jetty-util-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148) [jetty-util-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136) [jetty-util-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671) [jetty-util-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589) [jetty-util-9.3.20.v20170531.jar:9.3.20.v20170531]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [?:1.8.0_171]

↧

JT-47928: When field is mandatory only when condition is met, it is impossible to change the field

November 27, 2018, 1:33 am

≫ Next: JT-48999: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.youtrack.timetracking.periodField.PeriodFieldWrapper.setValueString, parameter valueString

≪ Previous: JT-50526: Parameter specified as non-null is null: method jetbrains.charisma.customfields.oldRest.enumeration.OldRestEnumsBundleResource.postBundleName, parameter newName

Reporter	Shay Solomon (fieldbit)
Created	Jun 28, 2018 12:24:04 PM
Updated	Nov 27, 2018 12:33:14 PM
State	Open
Assignee	Alexander Volfman (Alexander.Volfman)
Subsystem	Workflow
Type	Bug
Priority	Normal
Browser	Any Browser
OS	Any OS
Fix versions	Unscheduled
Affected versions	Unknown

What steps will reproduce the problem?

Create some custom field (e.g. Fix-Version)
Make it visible only if the state is "Resolved"
3.Now change an issue from New to Resolved.
A command window is opened,as expected, with the correct label that "Fix-Version is required"
Set the Fix-Version to some value and press apply
ERROR: "The Fix-Version field is not supported for issues with State: New"

Although I changed the state to Resolved.

What is the expected result?
The command windows should have been opened with action to change also the state, not only fix-version

What happens instead?

Please provide any additional information below.
When working in experiential view of issue page, it works!!!

↧